首页> 外文OA文献 >1997–2007 CO trend at the high Alpine site Jungfraujoch: a comparison between NDIR surface in situ and FTIR remote sensing observations
【2h】

1997–2007 CO trend at the high Alpine site Jungfraujoch: a comparison between NDIR surface in situ and FTIR remote sensing observations

机译:1997–2007年,高寒地区少女峰的CO趋势:NDIR地表与FTIR遥感观测之间的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Within the atmospheric research community, there is a strong interest in integrated datasets, combining data from several instrumentations. This integration is complicated by the different characteristics of the datasets, inherent to the measurement techniques. Here we have compared two carbon monoxide time series (1997 till 2007) acquired at the high-Alpine research station Jungfraujoch (3580 m above sea level), with two well-established measurement techniques, namely in situ surface concentration measurements using Non-Dispersive Infrared Absorption technology (NDIR), and ground-based remote sensing measurements using solar absorption Fourier Transform Infrared spectrometry (FTIR). The profile information available in the FTIR signal allowed us to extract an independent layer with a top height of 7.18 km above sea level, appropriate for comparison with our in situ measurements. We show that, even if both techniques are able to measure free troposphere CO concentrations, the datasets exhibit marked differences in their overall trends (−3.21 ± 0.03 ppb/year for NDIR vs. −0.8 ± 0.4 ppb/year for FTIR). Removing measurements that are polluted by uprising boundary layer air has a strong impact on the NDIR trend (now −2.62 ± 0.03 ppb/year), but its difference with FTIR remains significant. Using the LAGRANTO trajectory model, we show that both measurement techniques are influenced by different source regions and therefore are likely subject to exhibit significant differences in their overall trend behaviour. However the observation that the NDIR-FTIR trend difference is as significant before as after 2001 is at odds with available emission databases which claim a significant Asian CO increase after 2001 only.
机译:在大气研究界内,人们对集成数据集非常感兴趣,这些数据集将几种仪器的数据结合在一起。测量技术固有的数据集的不同特征使这种集成变得复杂。在这里,我们比较了在高山高地少女峰(海拔3580 m)处获得的两个一氧化碳时间序列(1997年至2007年)与两种公认的测量技术,即使用非分散红外的原位表面浓度测量吸收技术(NDIR),以及使用太阳吸收傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)进行的基于地面的遥感测量。 FTIR信号中可用的剖面信息使我们能够提取一个独立层,其最高高度为海拔7.18 km,适合与我们的现场测量结果进行比较。我们表明,即使两种技术都能够测量对流层中的游离CO浓度,数据集的总体趋势也显示出显着差异(NDIR为-3.21±0.03 ppb /年,FTIR为-0.8±0.4 ppb /年)。去除因边界层空气上升而污染的测量值对NDIR趋势有很大影响(现在为-2.62±0.03 ppb /年),但与FTIR的差异仍然很大。使用LAGRANTO轨迹模型,我们表明这两种测量技术均受不同源区域的影响,因此很可能在总体趋势行为上表现出显着差异。但是,关于NDIR-FTIR趋势差异在2001年之前和之后一样显着的观察结果与现有的排放数据库不一致,后者仅声称2001年后亚洲的CO显着增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号